data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a3c/60a3cbcf31a0393aaa5e7eb6beb5d952bbf72803" alt="Proton mail tor"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e65a/2e65a3fb1395254fad8e9ca53b15f01850e5a968" alt="proton mail tor proton mail tor"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeffe/aeffec27e6400097b1e27417f176d91e712e97ca" alt="proton mail tor proton mail tor"
Signal and Matrix might be the best in this area. But neither are ready for everyday use right now.Īnd then there are the myriad of messaging services. Other network-wide technology solutions outside of Tor might include encrypted DNS and DIDs. Unfortunately, ProtonMail’s own marketing effort makes this all more difficult.Ĭlear communication might not be a very satisfying answer, but it might be the best we have. But certain realities must be clearly communicated to people doing the hard work on the ground. There is no such thing as a truly secure system.States will inevitably abuse certain laws if citizens threaten those who hold power.ProtonMail provided metadata on certain individuals at the state’s request.ProtonMail’s cryptographic guarantees remain intact.There are four premises that I do think are true: At best - using Tor would have forced the state to employ a different forensic method if they wanted to accost climate activists. I wonder if we should examine the premise of the question? Security concerns have even been raised in regards to Tor, Tor exit nodes, etc… As a person who follows the money to understand incentives, I find Tor’s funding quite suspicious.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a3c/60a3cbcf31a0393aaa5e7eb6beb5d952bbf72803" alt="Proton mail tor"